Hey all!
Just wanted to let you know that I have a new website up for my photo shoots that I'm doing. I'm hoping to turn this into more of a side-business than just a hobby, so please tell your friends! :)
Thanks so much!
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Fairy Tales vs. Real Life
So I came across this blog post and felt the need to post it on my blog because I agree with it so much. =) I am continually encouraged that there are more and more people out there who do not believe in the dream that Hollywood likes to portray as reality. Let us not succumb to the fairy dust that has been sprinkled over our lives through the media's display of life and love.
Cole is a great writer and I don't think I could possibly expound on what he said regarding today's media and "love".
Thursday, April 1, 2010
The Dearest Place on Earth
I want to share with you a radical change of heart that has taken place in my life in the past few months.
Since the beginning of this year, my local church has been going through some really tough changes on the heels of a tumultuous, challenging season. I've never experienced the emotions, good and bad, towards my church family that I have in the past few months. I've been confused, anxious, and scared...all of which are evidences of my LACK of trust in God's sovereign plan over my life. Sadly, I chose to first distance myself from my Savior instead of first crying out to Him for faith and direction. I caused myself hours of needless worry and anxiety...not because I now realize I can put my full trust in the leaders at my church, because I can't. They are sinners saved by grace, just like me. But the anxiety and worry was needless because I CAN and should put my full trust in the sovereign God of the universe...the One who has full authority over my life, over the life of the church, and over its' leaders.
I feel like God suddenly lifted the veil from my eyes to see my OWN self-righteousness in how i was responding to these past few months. What He's revealed to me, is this: if I believe God called me to this local church, and the Church is the Bride of Christ, then why would I not treat the bride of Christ as I would my own earthly spouse? If my spouse, whom I made a covenant to stick with 'for better or WORSE', has sinned against me but is now showing signs of repentance and humility, who am I to cast judgment on them and say they don't DESERVE my forgiveness and then walk away from that covenant? If we as Christians firmly believe that a husband should not leave his wife even if she sinned against him, but that he should stand by her side and lead her to genuine repentance...why would we not take on the same attitude within the Church? Yes, a pastor has more spiritual responsibility weighing on his conscience because God has anointed him to shepherd a flock, but that pastor is STILL just a man. So for me to not forgive, or to pass judgment, or to 'flee when things get hard' is to ultimately say (I believe) that God's grace is sufficient for MY sins, but not for my pastor's. God opened my eyes to see that I was headed down a road where I was quickly allowing my heart to be governed by pride and my own judgments, rather than be governed and led by the Gospel. Praise be to God that He stopped me in my tracks!
I want to thank the pastors at my local church for how, though they are still sinners, they continue to pursue humility no matter how difficult things become.
In looking for some form of encouragement, I came across Charles Spurgeon's Morning & Evening for today. =)
The King's Highway
The wayfaring men, though fools, shall not err therein. (Isaiah 35:8)
The way of holiness is so straight and plain that the simplest minds cannot go astray if they constantly follow it. The worldly wise have many twists and turns, and yet they make terrible blunders and generally miss their end. Worldly policy is a poor, shortsighted thing, and when men choose it as their road, it leads them over dark mountains. Gracious minds know no better than to do as the Lord bids them; but this keeps them in the King's highway and under royal protection.
Let the reader never for a moment attempt to help himself out of a difficulty by a falsehood or by a questionable act; but let him keep in the middle of the high road of truth and integrity, and he will be following the best possible course. In our lives we must never practice circular sailing nor dream of shuffling. Be just and fear not, Follow Jesus and heed no evil consequences. If the worst of ills could be avoided by wrongdoing, we should, in the very attempt, have fallen into an evil worse than any other ill could be. God's way must be the very best way. Follow it though men think you a fool, and you will be truly wise.
Lord, lead Thy servants in a plain path because of their enemies.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Moments
Do you ever have those little moments of pure freedom? Maybe you have those frequently and you know exactly what I'm talking about. Or maybe you've never had that moment and you feel as though you're being suffocated as you read this. Or perhaps you simply don't care. Regardless, this is my blog so I want to share my 'moment' with you. =)
My 'moment' came on a beautiful warm afternoon...the kind of warm that is subtle, yet readily welcomed by a Florida girl who's experienced one too many consistently chilling days. This warm afternoon, coupled with eating lunch by a lake with friends, led to driving away from the park by myself...windows rolled down, singing in that "I don't care if you can hear me, in fact I really hope you can" voice...driving with my knees, one arm hanging out the window, the other stretched across the front seat, wind tousling my hair. THIS. This was my moment of freedom. I hadn't accomplished anything in particular that day. I hadn't 'rebelled' against authority (to my knowledge) so it wasn't a "bad girl" freedom. It was simply, "I'm free. I'm alive, I am who I am because that's who God made me".
My 'moment' came on a beautiful warm afternoon...the kind of warm that is subtle, yet readily welcomed by a Florida girl who's experienced one too many consistently chilling days. This warm afternoon, coupled with eating lunch by a lake with friends, led to driving away from the park by myself...windows rolled down, singing in that "I don't care if you can hear me, in fact I really hope you can" voice...driving with my knees, one arm hanging out the window, the other stretched across the front seat, wind tousling my hair. THIS. This was my moment of freedom. I hadn't accomplished anything in particular that day. I hadn't 'rebelled' against authority (to my knowledge) so it wasn't a "bad girl" freedom. It was simply, "I'm free. I'm alive, I am who I am because that's who God made me".
This was my moment. What was yours?
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Christianity? Or American Religion?
In seeing some disturbing online headlines on a couple of well-known televangelists, I started clicking on a couple of different links to see what different newspapers and intellectuals had to say about televangelism in general. I found this review by Gerard Reed on the below mentioned book (bold print is my emphasis):
“Most of us know, if only on a tacit level, that television has transformed our world's cultural landscape. Yet few of us seriously probe its workings and implications for the church as well as for the broader society. Quentin J. Schultze, in Televangelism and American Culture: the Business of Popular Religion helps us do so. One of the authors of Dancing in the Dark, Schultze teaches communications at Calvin College and is a highly regarded scholar who's devoted much care to the study of television. He not only watches the programs, he studies the flood of solicitations sent to those who respond to the televangelists' appeals. What concerns Schultze is "how and why televangelists are helping to transform American Christianity from a church into a business, from a historic faith into a popular religion based at least in part on superstition". Still more, he argues that "televangelism is probably the most characteristic and remunerative expression of American religion. It is the nation's own religion, a special Protestant hybrid raised in American culture and nurtured by the mass media. Televangelism may even be the flagship of American religion, setting the style and tone of local and denominational life". TV "ministries" almost always share certain traits. They are "audience-supported" --since funds come from viewers' contributions the ministries must cultivate and maintain a loyal audience, so the message is tailored to please those who watch. You can easily shift channels. You write checks only when you're happy with the presentation. Keeping the audience happy, maintaining its allegiance becomes a preeminent concern. They are "personality-led"--we want "stars" and "celebrities" in religion as much as in athletics and films, so successful TV preachers and singers must be attractive personalities. It helps if they're good looking. (Knowing I planned to visit Lloyd John Ogilve's church in Hollywood, a lady who works with my wife asked me to see if he's really as handsome as he looks on TV. Well, I've seen him . . . and he is!) They are "experientially-validated"--few doctrines or historical traditions receive much attention, but practical, how-to-do-it-and-enjoy-it messages abound. The audience, of course, likely includes folks from a variety of theological persuasions, so you must not risk alienating any of them. Even moral stances may be muted. (One study found a direct correlation between TV viewing and knowledge of the 10 Commandments--the more religious TV watched, the fewer of the commandments were known!)
"Technologically sophisticated," TV ministries rival the best, state-of-the-art equipment and production techniques of their secular counterparts. They are "entertainment-oriented"--to keep folks' attention you must use variety show or talk show formats and imitate the Johnny Carsons who score with the American public. Not many Lloyd John Ogilve type church services last long on TV. Finally, they are "expansionary-minded"--the "success" of the ministry is judged by the number of viewers and size of their offerings. Were the above characteristics restricted to TV ministries, they might not overly concern us. But a serious problem appears when the people who watch TV programs come to the local church--and most all the folks who watch televangelists also attend local churches--and expect TV-style religion! Early critics of TV ministries feared they would tempt people to stay away from church, but that's not happened. What has happened is perhaps worse: TV addicts crave similar "fixes" in their weekly worship services! (Even more problematic in my mind, though Schultze doesn't focus on it: those who never watch religious TV watch incredible hours of regular TV, and their whole attitude toward life, their basic taste in communication, has been thoroughly shaped by the medium.)
So we want messages and programs that please us--if not, we scoot down the road in search of a church which "ministers to us," unconcerned with denominational or community ties. We demand that our singers and preachers be alluring personalities, as polished and winsome as Robert Schuller or as old-fashioned and fiery as Jerry Fallwell. We really want to be free of dogma and denominational distinctives--after all, it's what we feel in our hearts, what enables us to cope with family problems, what provides therapeutic advice illuminating our psychological ills, which most matters. TV ministries, and TV in general, breed "Christians" who have little concern with what the Christian faith has historically considered central. Americans have always demanded up-to-date technology, and Evangelicals, while often resisting intellectually "modern" trends, have embraced technically "modern" developments with reckless abandon. (I'm always amazed by the sound systems in churches which serve 50 people! Without a microphone, it seems, no message amounts to much!). We've refused to see "modernity" as a whole, as something you cannot easily pick and choose purely wholesome dividends. We really want our church services to be entertaining. We insist our congregational plans be growth-oriented--woe to the pastor who doubts the need for a new gym of "family worship center"!
After brooding about such developments, Schultze says we must discern the "demonic" in the medium. Quoting William Stringfellow, Schultze declares that "televangelism exists in a 'state of alienation from God, cut off from the life originating in his life, separated from its own true life and, thus, being in a state of death'". Nevertheless, Schultze insists TV will not go away, nor will Televangelism. What we need to discover, he suggests in the book's final chapter, are ways to redeem it. He thinks televangelists should be more accountable to governing bodies. He urges churches to focus more study on the medium, helping believers see how they are manipulated and thus prepare them to more wisely cope with it.
I'm not sure Schultze's recommendations will solve the problems, but his treatise certainly helps me think about how powerfully TV dominates our culture, even our religious culture, and stimulates us to consider ways to correct or counteract its influence.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’m not familiar with Reed’s background, but I find his analysis of televangelism and my limited personal views of televangelism to be extremely similar. While I believe that men like Billy Graham revolutionized televangelism and spread the Gospel to numerous unreached cities across the world, it’s sad to see Graham’s work ‘overshadowed’ (in a sense) by more cutting-edge, charismatic men who appeal to the “itching ears” of America.
Don’t get me wrong- I certainly believe that God can use the prideful attempts of money-hungry men to further the Gospel, which only displays the greatness of His power; but the materialistic empires that are being built in “the name of God” are sickening to me. In my opinion, if your “messages” stray so far from the truth in Scriptures from the very beginning of your “ministry”…you weren’t ‘in the biz’ to see lost souls come to Christ.
The Christian life is not about living happily on this earth with as many comforts and pleasures as we can grab for ourselves. Jesus didn’t live a ‘comfortable’ life…why should we? =) As gloomy as that may sound, the ‘discomfort’ of the Christian life does not come without promise of future happiness! Scripture says that we, as Christians, WILL experience pain and trials in this life; but we are instructed by God to rejoice in our own sufferings and trials because we have the glorious promise of what’s to come.
We were not called to live overabundant lives…hoarding money for ourselves, taking advantages of our ‘weaker brothers’. We were not called to share ‘messages’ without substance or conviction.
Christians are called to “go forth and preach the gospel into all the nations” (including our own communities) and to live in contentment, happy with the resources God has given us. In an article by Robert D. Jones, we’re shown what contentment looks like as described by Paul in Philippians 4:11-13. Jones writes, “contentment does not depend on our circumstances…our spiritual happiness does not depend on our life happenings. Contentment can occur in even the worst situation.” So why do these televangelists insist on pushing the ‘prosperity message’? Could it be because they lack conviction and substance in their own lives?
“Most of us know, if only on a tacit level, that television has transformed our world's cultural landscape. Yet few of us seriously probe its workings and implications for the church as well as for the broader society. Quentin J. Schultze, in Televangelism and American Culture: the Business of Popular Religion helps us do so. One of the authors of Dancing in the Dark, Schultze teaches communications at Calvin College and is a highly regarded scholar who's devoted much care to the study of television. He not only watches the programs, he studies the flood of solicitations sent to those who respond to the televangelists' appeals. What concerns Schultze is "how and why televangelists are helping to transform American Christianity from a church into a business, from a historic faith into a popular religion based at least in part on superstition". Still more, he argues that "televangelism is probably the most characteristic and remunerative expression of American religion. It is the nation's own religion, a special Protestant hybrid raised in American culture and nurtured by the mass media. Televangelism may even be the flagship of American religion, setting the style and tone of local and denominational life". TV "ministries" almost always share certain traits. They are "audience-supported" --since funds come from viewers' contributions the ministries must cultivate and maintain a loyal audience, so the message is tailored to please those who watch. You can easily shift channels. You write checks only when you're happy with the presentation. Keeping the audience happy, maintaining its allegiance becomes a preeminent concern. They are "personality-led"--we want "stars" and "celebrities" in religion as much as in athletics and films, so successful TV preachers and singers must be attractive personalities. It helps if they're good looking. (Knowing I planned to visit Lloyd John Ogilve's church in Hollywood, a lady who works with my wife asked me to see if he's really as handsome as he looks on TV. Well, I've seen him . . . and he is!) They are "experientially-validated"--few doctrines or historical traditions receive much attention, but practical, how-to-do-it-and-enjoy-it messages abound. The audience, of course, likely includes folks from a variety of theological persuasions, so you must not risk alienating any of them. Even moral stances may be muted. (One study found a direct correlation between TV viewing and knowledge of the 10 Commandments--the more religious TV watched, the fewer of the commandments were known!)
"Technologically sophisticated," TV ministries rival the best, state-of-the-art equipment and production techniques of their secular counterparts. They are "entertainment-oriented"--to keep folks' attention you must use variety show or talk show formats and imitate the Johnny Carsons who score with the American public. Not many Lloyd John Ogilve type church services last long on TV. Finally, they are "expansionary-minded"--the "success" of the ministry is judged by the number of viewers and size of their offerings. Were the above characteristics restricted to TV ministries, they might not overly concern us. But a serious problem appears when the people who watch TV programs come to the local church--and most all the folks who watch televangelists also attend local churches--and expect TV-style religion! Early critics of TV ministries feared they would tempt people to stay away from church, but that's not happened. What has happened is perhaps worse: TV addicts crave similar "fixes" in their weekly worship services! (Even more problematic in my mind, though Schultze doesn't focus on it: those who never watch religious TV watch incredible hours of regular TV, and their whole attitude toward life, their basic taste in communication, has been thoroughly shaped by the medium.)
So we want messages and programs that please us--if not, we scoot down the road in search of a church which "ministers to us," unconcerned with denominational or community ties. We demand that our singers and preachers be alluring personalities, as polished and winsome as Robert Schuller or as old-fashioned and fiery as Jerry Fallwell. We really want to be free of dogma and denominational distinctives--after all, it's what we feel in our hearts, what enables us to cope with family problems, what provides therapeutic advice illuminating our psychological ills, which most matters. TV ministries, and TV in general, breed "Christians" who have little concern with what the Christian faith has historically considered central. Americans have always demanded up-to-date technology, and Evangelicals, while often resisting intellectually "modern" trends, have embraced technically "modern" developments with reckless abandon. (I'm always amazed by the sound systems in churches which serve 50 people! Without a microphone, it seems, no message amounts to much!). We've refused to see "modernity" as a whole, as something you cannot easily pick and choose purely wholesome dividends. We really want our church services to be entertaining. We insist our congregational plans be growth-oriented--woe to the pastor who doubts the need for a new gym of "family worship center"!
After brooding about such developments, Schultze says we must discern the "demonic" in the medium. Quoting William Stringfellow, Schultze declares that "televangelism exists in a 'state of alienation from God, cut off from the life originating in his life, separated from its own true life and, thus, being in a state of death'". Nevertheless, Schultze insists TV will not go away, nor will Televangelism. What we need to discover, he suggests in the book's final chapter, are ways to redeem it. He thinks televangelists should be more accountable to governing bodies. He urges churches to focus more study on the medium, helping believers see how they are manipulated and thus prepare them to more wisely cope with it.
I'm not sure Schultze's recommendations will solve the problems, but his treatise certainly helps me think about how powerfully TV dominates our culture, even our religious culture, and stimulates us to consider ways to correct or counteract its influence.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’m not familiar with Reed’s background, but I find his analysis of televangelism and my limited personal views of televangelism to be extremely similar. While I believe that men like Billy Graham revolutionized televangelism and spread the Gospel to numerous unreached cities across the world, it’s sad to see Graham’s work ‘overshadowed’ (in a sense) by more cutting-edge, charismatic men who appeal to the “itching ears” of America.
Don’t get me wrong- I certainly believe that God can use the prideful attempts of money-hungry men to further the Gospel, which only displays the greatness of His power; but the materialistic empires that are being built in “the name of God” are sickening to me. In my opinion, if your “messages” stray so far from the truth in Scriptures from the very beginning of your “ministry”…you weren’t ‘in the biz’ to see lost souls come to Christ.
The Christian life is not about living happily on this earth with as many comforts and pleasures as we can grab for ourselves. Jesus didn’t live a ‘comfortable’ life…why should we? =) As gloomy as that may sound, the ‘discomfort’ of the Christian life does not come without promise of future happiness! Scripture says that we, as Christians, WILL experience pain and trials in this life; but we are instructed by God to rejoice in our own sufferings and trials because we have the glorious promise of what’s to come.
We were not called to live overabundant lives…hoarding money for ourselves, taking advantages of our ‘weaker brothers’. We were not called to share ‘messages’ without substance or conviction.
Christians are called to “go forth and preach the gospel into all the nations” (including our own communities) and to live in contentment, happy with the resources God has given us. In an article by Robert D. Jones, we’re shown what contentment looks like as described by Paul in Philippians 4:11-13. Jones writes, “contentment does not depend on our circumstances…our spiritual happiness does not depend on our life happenings. Contentment can occur in even the worst situation.” So why do these televangelists insist on pushing the ‘prosperity message’? Could it be because they lack conviction and substance in their own lives?
Visit this website to decide for yourself whether some televangelists really do preach the Gospel message...or the prosperity message.
The following link will take you to a radio broadcast by Todd Friel on The Way of The Master: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SuZoHYUZ7o&feature=related and Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYFKFdxdGPw&NR=1 where Friel addresses Osteen’s most recent published work (A Better You). Notice also, Osteen’s ‘message’ drops in confidence from when he’s on stage giving his ‘messages’ (mucho confidence onstage), to whenever he’s being interviewed (where there’s a lot of “I think…I don’t know…I don’t like to judge…I don’t like to beat people down”). I’m not all about 'bashing' people, but when you're claiming to be a Christian preacher, and you have a following as big as Osteen, I can't help but feel the need to reveal him as the false prophet that he is.
The following link will take you to a radio broadcast by Todd Friel on The Way of The Master: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SuZoHYUZ7o&feature=related and Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYFKFdxdGPw&NR=1 where Friel addresses Osteen’s most recent published work (A Better You). Notice also, Osteen’s ‘message’ drops in confidence from when he’s on stage giving his ‘messages’ (mucho confidence onstage), to whenever he’s being interviewed (where there’s a lot of “I think…I don’t know…I don’t like to judge…I don’t like to beat people down”). I’m not all about 'bashing' people, but when you're claiming to be a Christian preacher, and you have a following as big as Osteen, I can't help but feel the need to reveal him as the false prophet that he is.
In my opinion, Joel Osteen has become the Pied Piper of American religion and people need to hear the Gospel truth on a consistent/weekly basis…not just a motivational pep-talk.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
I Can Hear the Bells...
Well my sister FINALLY got married! =) And OH, what a beautiful, joyous, anointed occasion it was!
I am so very happy for my sister and new bro-in-law, though I'm still getting used to the idea of them being married. My sister was THE most beautiful bride I've ever seen. Truly. And I've seen a few. But no amount of makeup, hairspray, or curls can even compare to the kind of beauty that radiates from the soul! My sis has truly found the man of her dreams and you couldn't have contained her excitement that day even if you had held her down. ;) Her attitude throughout the whole day was amazing. Not once did she turn into "bridezilla".
Emotionally, I did fine all day...then the wedding started. :) I got goosebumps as the Pride & Prejudice music crescendoed (sp?), and then...I saw my dad walking Jenn up the aisle. Yup. I lost it at that point. My big sis was ACTUALLY getting married. This wasn't just a dream I was having because she and I had stayed up late the night before plotting and scheming our "future weddings". This was real. Dad was REALLY giving her away, they were REALLY saying their vows to each other (which also made me cry), and Jenn REALLY became Mrs Jennifer Fountain. =) What a blessing to be involved in such a glorious event as this. WHAT a blessing to be able to stand by a friend and your sister, in full confidence that God had brought these two together...not just their emotions. My sister and new brother-in-law officially began their life together on February 5, 2010 and I'm so excited to see what the Lord has in store for their future together, as a married couple. =)
Please go to Kristen's Blog to get a taste of what the wedding was like!
P.s. Even though they got married in the spring, you'll notice Jenn still got to have her fall/winter wedding that she's always wanted. Just thought I'd point that out. =)
Monday, November 23, 2009
Tales from the Motherland
So I'm going to attempt to blog our whole trip in one sitting...for real. ;) For those of you who don't know, my friends Sarah and John Morgan decided last January that they were going to take a week-long trip to Ireland. They started asking people in February, and I was one of them, if we wanted to go with them in November of this year. I initially turned them down because of work and lack of vacay-time.
3 weeks before they were supposed to leave, Sarah told me they had another spot open on the trip. It would cost me less than $800 for the WHOLE trip, and I had vacay time available. So I went. And these are the happenings...in order. =)
Thursday, Nov 5 Rebekah Schwab, Luke Holger, Damaris Wells, and I spent the night at the Morgans and our plane left around noon on Friday. We got into Dublin around 10:30am their time on the 7th. Janelle Leach met us in the airport, we picked up a rental van (no small task) and drove into the city for a few hours. Might I say that Janelle was SUCH a blessing to our group...from the very beginning! She brought her GPS (sat-nav) with her so the first few days of navigating were significantly easier!
We walked around Dublin taking pictures for a while, ate lunch at a McDonalds (I know. FIRST meal in another country and we go to the golden arches!), and then went in to Carroll's (a souvenir shop) and bought some touristy treasures. We stopped at Trinity College to walk around and were going to do the tour of the Book of Kells but it required money and time that we didn't have. So we moved on to the Guinness Brewery. We took the abbreviated tour so that some in our group could take a class in how to appropriately pour a pint of Guinness and receive a certificate for this feat. Then we went to the top floor which was called the Gravity Bar, if I'm not mistaken- floor to ceiling windows so we had a 360 degree view of Dublin. It was lovely, but we wanted to get on the road because we had to drive across the country (should've taken about 3 1/2 hours) to get to our cottage. We stopped in a city called Athlone and ducked into Sean's Bar for a few minutes to hear some musicians. But they didn't have food and our group was famished, so we left. We finally got into Doolin around 8pm and had dinner at Fitzpatricks. The food was AMAZING there! I had some sort of creamy tomato pasta dish. =) John followed the owner of the cottage out there while we sat and ate our food. He unloaded the ENTIRE van by himself and THEN came back to get us. We were very grateful!
As soon as we pulled up to the cottage, all us girls started shrieking and giggling. It seriously is THE most adorable cottage you'll ever see! So we unpacked and went to bed. =)
Sunday morning, Anne knocked on our door and had us follow her over to her family's castle: Ballinalacken Castle. This was truly THE MOST beautiful castle I've ever seen in person. Absolutely breath-taking. We spent about an hour just roaming throughout the castle ruins, taking loads of pictures/video and admiring God's handiwork. We thanked Anne for taking us there (the castle isn't open to the public), and then we left for the Cliffs of Moher (the cliffs of Insanity- from Princess Bride)! We spent ALL afternoon on the cliffs. There are no words to describe the beauty we beheld, standing at the edge of the steep cliffs, watching the waves crash into the rocks hundreds of feet below us. At one point, we were walking, and noticed that the wind had carried bits of foam from the ocean way down below up onto the path in front of us. Very bizarre for us Floridians. ;) Yes, we trespassed, along with a dozen other tourists, but it truly was well-worth the risk. Most of the time my mouth couldn't even form words to express what I was seeing. I just drank it all in in silence...for the most part!
We begrudgingly left the cliffs so that we could hit the local market and stock up on groceries. We drove into Ennistymon and stopped at a SuperValu...this store became our friend, for the next five days. =) We bought the goods and drove back to the cottage to make spaghetti for dinner.
Monday, we drove into town to go to Doolin Cave but it was closed. =( So we drove into Galway and went shopping, ate lunch (fish n' chips) at McDonaugh's, went to the famous Claddagh Jewelry store (the lady gave us a history lesson too, very interesting!), did some more souvey shopping, and then went to Kingshead Pub where Janelle and I shared Irish Tapas. Yum! We hadn't had our fill of 'live irish music' yet, so we walked over to Taffaes Bar and stayed for a while. *insert several stories here from the rest of the group*
Tuesday we drove Janelle to Shannon airport and said our goodbyes ::sniff::. Then the remaining 6 of us drove to the town of Dingle (berry!) and toured the "PREHISTORIC Beehives"...which were really just old...not prehistoric. ;) But they were still cool and we caught John on video trying to herd sheep. *grin*
This town had some of the most beautiful coast-line I've ever seen. I actually got tired/frustrated of saying "wow" and "oh my goodness" because around every corner, every bend in the road, just when you thought it couldn't get any MORE spectacular...it DID! =) We even saw a 'complete half' rainbow! ::sigh:: It was amazing.
Then we drove back and stopped in Limerick to have dinner at a 'posh' restaurant. Rebekah and I each got a Ploughman's Panini, Luke had Cottage Pie (similar to Shepherd's Pie), Damaris had 'bangers and mash', and...John got a burger. =P I forget what Sarah had..? Good food though.
Wednesday John woke up really sick and Rebekah wasn't feeling well, so we all slept in, and then Damaris, Luke, Sarah and I ventured out into the countryside on foot. =) WHAT a glorious time! We ended up being gone for four hours! We made our way down to the rocks by the shore and took tons of pictures along the way. Again, the view was breath-taking! The waves crashing up on the rocks, water seeping into every nook and cranny around you...then quickly slinking back into the sea...then returning again just as quickly as it left...it was simply splendid!
We got home around 4pm and made grilled cheese sandwiches and tomato soup...MMMmmm!!! Then we decided to have 'movie night' so we popped popcorn (one of the highlights of our trip) and watched a movie called "This is My Father"...I wouldn't recommend it. We had to fastforward a few scenes, but our intent was to watch a typical irish film. And this movie was set in Galway. =) So we all gathered 'round the very small tv with our popcorn, cans of coke, boxes of Nerds, Whoppers?, and blankets and ended our night in front of the telly. ;)
Thursday we drove into Ennistymon to go to the bank and use internet at Ooh La La Cafe, which had only just been open 4 weeks by a girl around my age, sweet as can be! While we were using the internet to check email and send the last update to our parents, some of us got hot chocolate and I got a nutella/banana crepe! Mmm!
After that, we stopped at SuperValu and got peanut butter, jam, and bread to make sandwiches for lunch. We drove to Killarney because Luke said that a friend of his has a family castle (Ross Castle) in Killarney National Park; so we drove to find it. =) We parked outside a beautiful cathedral and Sarah and Damaris ran to find a bathroom, John and Rebekah (still both not feeling well) stayed in the van, and Luke and I opened up the boot of the van and made pb&j sandwiches for everyone (also not an easy task, as their slices of bread are much larger than in the U.S. and we ran out of jam quickly).
We all walked through the cathedral, quietly taking pictures. Then we went in to the National park in search of Ross Castle. It was REALLY windy and cold, but we didn't care. We just kept walking. Along the way we saw 2 deer, a couple dogs, and a leprechaun. John tried to chase the leprechaun down but he was too fast and magically disappeared into thin air! As we neared the road to Ross Castle (it was a BIG park!) a couple walked past us saying the road was flooded. Now in my mind, I'm thinking a few inches deep, and maybe several feet across...or maybe there would be a way around it if we got off the path. Silly Stephy. Sarah and Damaris had their wellies on so they decided to brave the flooded path. Then Luke decided to go too, since it was his idea to come here...even though he most definitely did not have wellies on. ;) The water came up above their calves in the deepest parts, but the path was flooded for at least a couple hundred feet (maybe more?) and there was no way getting around it. So obviously, Luke's shoes got soaked through but he kept going. The 3 muskateers took a few pictures then trudged back. Meanwhile, John constructed a make-shift bench for Rebekah, me and him to sit on while we waited. Since none of us had phones, we had no idea how long it was going to take them. After a short while, we saw the crazy girls rounding the corner...CARRYING Luke! Hah, that only lasted a few feet though. So we walked back to the van, the trio took their socks and shoes off to let their feet dry ;) and then we drove in to Ennistymon for a few more groceries. We stopped at a 'fish n chips' joint for dinner (but John was really tired so he stayed in the van and slept) and then walked over to Daly's to hear some local musicians play...it was GREAT! By this time though, our entire crew (except for me and Damaris) was sick so we went home after a while and had 'picture time with Luke' before going to bed.
Friday we drove into Ennistymon one last time, then drove over to LaHinch (a surf town) and walked around, admiring the waves crashing on the rocks...and the Sarah. ;) We grabbed lunch at a little 'glorified gas station' and then Sarah and Damaris made Irish stew for us...on our last night. ::sniff:: After dinner we fixed popcorn and hot chocolate and had our 'last picture time w/ Luke'. But then I think none of us really wanted to go to sleep that night cuz we knew we'd have to leave. So we all fell asleep in the living room (only for a few hours). Then gradually...one by one, we all went back to our rooms to sleep until 3am when we had to leave for the Dublin airport. The drive back was long and miserable because none of us really wanted to leave. None of us were ready to get back to 'real life'...and all the busyness it entails. None of us were ready to split up the little 'irish family' God put together specifically for this trip. But alas, our jobs and bio-fams were calling us back to the states. ;)
It was such a lovely time in Ireland, and I plan to go back again...very soon. =)
By the way, I WILL post pictures...after this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
